With Web 2.0, more and more people have their documents, products, personal details and photos stashed all over the internet – what issues does this raise for education?
- and, it’s in lovely Barcelona! (25 October, 2006)
With Web 2.0, more and more people have their documents, products, personal details and photos stashed all over the internet – what issues does this raise for education?
- and, it’s in lovely Barcelona! (25 October, 2006)
Inevitably I have gone off and started blogging elsewhere.
Aside: For such is the transformative power of LKL SoSo; bow down and be humbled in the presence of transformative group process… (whoops, I don’t know how that slipped in
)
One blog is explicitly for interacting with a new community I have caught up with, the Connected learning Community (see Frapper map here). That blog is markz space, and it is explicitly an experiment in transforming a blog into as much of a Personal Learning Environment (PLE) as the blog can become. I’m not entirely sure of future success, at least in blog-only form, but it will be interesting to see where it gets to. Some transformations are on hold for now while Blogger completes an important upgrade cycle.
My other blog is purely elearning related and a little scant at the moment, but has entries on the Wikipedia History of PLEs page, in response to Blackboard and its recent mis-founded patent of the VLE. See also the Wikipedia History of VLEs page.
Web-too-oh: Wondermark sums it up.
The Economist recently ran a survey on emerging media. Among other things, claiming that blogs and wikis are changing journalism from a sermon to a discussion.
A recent article on China and the Internet (subscribers only) claims that the government, with its 30,000 power internet police, can't keep up with blogger's challenges.
This week I will present a brief overview of Pierre Levy's theories on collective intelligence.
One of the most influential theorists of Cyberculture, Pierre Lévy offers a metaphorical conceptualization and posthumanistist theorizing of cyberspace to argue for a new relationship between technology and knowledge. His view on collective intelligence allows the cultivation of a mutually developed and enhanced knowledge space through social interaction and associatiative cognitive exchanges. Lévy’s ‘information utopia’ can be nspiring for grasping the cultural ethic of open source movements and social software we have been discussing in the seminars. But as much as such approaches enlighten some elements of the cultural interfaces of the Web, they also obscure, I would like to argue, the clear relationship between the Web, digital knowledge forms and the rest of the industrial society. I will try to combine some of our reflections on the definition and classification of social software with some of my research findings from online encyclopaedias (including wikipedia).
I just built my first Wiki by myself… feels good. It was a good exercise to do as it has really helped me to better understand the purpose of a Wiki as a site for knowledge collaboration. It wasn’t until I had to grasp the overall structure of the site, and to design instructions for others on how to use it that I really began to understand how the Wiki works. I’m still working on it and still learning, but getting there.
I’m feeling more confident about Wiki use and about the potential use I could make of it in a school setting (Lyndsay’s case study on wiki use in schools helped a lot there – thanks Lyndsay).
I also like the shape the LKL Wiki is taking on… I think we’re making good progress. It’s good to see that most of us have now contributed something, and said a little about ourselves and our interests in the project and the HowTo and WhatIs pages are giving it more of a ‘knowledge-building’ feel, I think.
When I began building the PBWiki for Mirandanet, I was struck by some questions that came to me as I began to generate a skeleton structure:
As I built the Wiki and wrestled with these ideas, and thought about the purpose of the Wiki and who would use it and what they would want to get from it – it finally dawned on me what the Wiki is and why it is different, more structured, than (say) something like this blog or a web page… it’s the collaborative nature of the thing… the whole point of the Wiki is that it’s not just shared (like a blog) – it’s (as Lyndsay suggested somewhere, I think)… a quasi-independent entity… it’s a thing-in-itself with a reason for being… it’s purpose of knowledge building… generates a space that is neither individual, nor collective but an amalgam of both… and separated from both… it becomes like a ‘cultural’ collective space, if you like… still fuzzy, that notion, but I’ll keep on thinking.
It’s like (for me) the blog is a discussion space, a meeting place… where we all keep our individual identities (and separated -as opposed to separate because in a way they interlink, through comments and temporal hierarchical positioning – narratives) whereas the Wiki is, not so much a ‘thinking’ space as a place of ‘established’ narratives – of community generated concepts (as in Mika’s piece). There’s a collaborative ‘will’ in the construction of knowledge in that space… towards a shared goal – the codification of an evolving structure into an emergent set of communal values (or ontology). Hmm, interesting, I seem to have come full circle tonight.